Phyrex.Ni

Phyrex.Ni

No extravagance, no waste

0Following
2.4Kfollowers

Feed

Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
Iran's Fars News reports that Iran has launched a Hormuz Safe shipping insurance platform for the Strait of Hormuz, claiming it can settle payments using Bitcoin The platform named Hormuz Safe / هرمز سیف has started providing insurance for maritime cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz. A document obtained by a Fars reporter shows that since the beginning of Ordibehesht month in the Iranian calendar, roughly late April 2026, the Iranian Ministry of Economy has been advancing a plan to "manage the Strait of Hormuz" through an insurance mechanism. This plan can issue various marine insurance policies and financial liability certificates, with potential revenue exceeding 10 billion USD. Fars also claims that platform rules indicate the related insurance will be settled using $BTC, with cargo confirmed on-chain and a signed receipt provided to the cargo owner. If implemented, this plan could bring Iran over 10 billion USD in revenue.
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
Recently, I've been discussing with many friends about the advantages of listing US stocks on the blockchain. Many might already know that my general theory is that purely listing US stocks on the blockchain is somewhat pointless; the real user attraction isn't in buying the actual stocks. In fact, using decentralized methods to buy US stocks has quite low trading volume. The real breakout potential should be in three categories: The first category is derivatives trading of US stocks, such as leveraged contracts on Nvidia. This indeed has market demand, but it has nothing to do with compliance; it purely depends on market enthusiasm. This is currently the largest demand. Including my own shorting of WTI, which is done in this way. Traditional brokers can also short, but it's hard for everyone to have leverage. Without leverage, the ceiling for US stocks in the crypto space is limited. The second category is dividend-paying US stocks. This is not the stock's own earnings; even $MSTR has created $STRC to offer an 11.5% dividend. Of course, tokenizing this has a limited ceiling for me because essentially it's about low-risk long exposure to Bitcoin. But if it’s high-quality, interest-bearing US stock products, that’s completely different. These are compliant products, regulated, and can offer decent dividends along with good stock growth potential. For example, $SCHD which I introduced last year. The third category is compliant, deliverable US stock IPOs. Unfortunately, there are still very few of these. Many current IPOs are SPVs or SPV-like structures, which essentially have no delivery capability. But I believe that as regulation improves, such opportunities will increase. Tonight, I want to chat with everyone about these topics.
RWAlpha.AI 华语
RWAlpha.AI 华语
📢 Tonight Space|5.18 · 8PM (UTC+8) The next chapter of US stock tokenization: Asset attributes or trading attributes? @RWAlpha_AI Chief Product Officer - @PhyrexNi deeply dissects the core issue—Does interest-bearing US stocks have the chance to completely replace DeFi yields? See you at 8pm tonight 👇Link: ✨ Jointly presented by @MetaEraCN @FOMOPayOfficial
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
I don't know how much time is left for Trump and Iran, but I do know that if things continue like this, inflation in the US will definitely keep rising. If this scenario plays out, the risk markets in the second half of 2026 may not be smooth sailing, especially after Trump's threats. Iran has stated it is prepared for any form of escalation, whether in the Strait of Hormuz or on its own territory.
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
My first time participating in Hong Kong IPOs, 7 stocks so far, and I haven't gotten any shares 😂 I don't even have the courage to keep trying. With that money, I could probably buy some stocks and earn enough for a simple meal.
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
After watching Sister Tree @EvaCmore's introduction, I was planning to participate in the new offerings in ZA, but I found out that China Merchants Yonglong also allows for Daxin, and there are no fees. Moreover, I was already using China Merchants Yonglong when binding my X earnings, and I exchanged Hong Kong dollars to save up. I think the personal limit is a few million Hong Kong dollars, but I can't remember clearly.
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
I often say I'm not a good person, but my badness is limited. About three days ago, I received an inquiry (no price was given, but it was said everything was negotiable). I believe everyone knows the content. I have never used BitMart, nor have I ever had any business cooperation with BitMart. At most, I interacted with a few old partners (who have all left now). The reason I didn't respond is simple: if there really was a crash or fraud, there's no need to pay anything. I have never accepted a single cent for defending rights, and all my rights protection efforts have nothing to do with my own interests. Those who pay me to defend rights, I am not worthy of. Also, the so-called "evidence" provided to me did not show any real proof of wrongdoing. I cannot conclude that an exchange has crashed just based on chat records. Similarly, I have never used @BitMart_zh, so I don't know if there are withdrawal issues or internal problems. No one has mentioned anything to me in private messages. If there were, BitMart has an office in Singapore, and I happen to know where it is. I strongly support legitimate rights protection and warmly welcome friends who need to defend their rights to contact me, no payment required.
BitMart 华语
BitMart 华语
These past couple of days for me: 🍉🍉🍉 I was always eating the drama from other exchanges, but today when I woke up: ??? How did I end up eating my own? Everyone, it’s the weekend, so please don’t FUD 🙏 Don’t spread rumors, don’t believe rumors, and look at all these little essays rationally. Eat when it’s time to eat, sleep when it’s time to sleep, and make money when it’s time to make money. Wishing everyone a happy weekend ❤️
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
When I just started working, I deeply realized that there aren't many people in this world who can help you. Even among close friends, there are few who can truly lend a hand. But there are countless people who dislike you just because they don't like the look of you. Regarding what Kitty said, I don't completely agree. I recently encountered a situation where even someone with status and influence, if they really lower their pride to target someone, often handle it in a "harmless" way. People who can thrive on both paths are the ones you really can't guard against. On the other hand, those who truly lack ability cause only limited collateral damage with their so-called scheming, and it's not difficult to make up for it.
Cato_KT
Cato_KT
Hearing this might be considered a radical statement, but if you think about it carefully, it is indeed true. When you hang out with impressive people, at most they look down on you, but they won't mess with you. However, when you hang out with a bunch of low-level people, no matter how careful you are, they will scheme against you, even going all out to harm you. Better to endure disdain from the wise than to get entangled with the worthless. This passage reminds me of an old saying: "A tree that stands out in the forest will be blown down by the wind," but what if the tree stands out in a grove? Could it then blend in and rely on each other?
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
Bitcoin's exchange reserves are at their lowest level in nearly five years The exchange reserves data is a very good indicator of investors' risk appetite. When investors collectively prepare to sell, the $BTC reserves on exchanges usually increase. It is clearly visible that whether in 2021 or 2024, when Bitcoin prices rise sharply, more BTC starts to concentrate on exchanges as investors prepare to find the best opportunity to exit. At this time, most investors still treat Bitcoin primarily as a financial investment. Sell when the price is high, buy the dip when the price is low. However, starting from July 2024, regardless of whether Bitcoin's price rises or falls, investors are generally withdrawing BTC from exchanges. This also indicates that more investors are losing interest in short-term selling and are increasingly optimistic about $BTC's long-term prospects. Even now, there hasn't been a large accumulation. It should be noted that those who really want to sell usually keep their coins on exchanges, while withdrawals from exchanges to the blockchain are often by those who do not intend to sell in the short term. It can be said that the less Bitcoin held on exchanges, the stronger the confidence of long-term investors. #Bitget VIP is here! Crypto, US stocks, CFDs, global opportunities all in one place
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
After 310 days, long-term holders' Bitcoin holdings have reached a new all-time high The last all-time high was on July 7, 2025, when Bitcoin's price was around $108,000. After that, the holdings of long-term holders began to decline, reaching a low of 14,441,390 BTC, which coincided with Bitcoin's price dropping to around $60,000. Since then, long-term Bitcoin holdings have continued to rise, seemingly without a direct correlation to price. When BTC price rises, this data rises; when BTC price falls, this data also rises. Currently, long-term held BTC has reached 14,847,218. This indicates: 1. Some long-term investors believe $60,000 was an excellent bottom-buying opportunity, and even at $80,000 they continued buying. 2. Even investors holding BTC at prices above $100,000 have selling targets well above $120,000, and more investors have long-term expectations for $BTC's value. 3. As long-term Bitcoin holdings increase, the circulating BTC in the market decreases. Short-term holders are currently the main drivers of price changes; when short-term holders reduce their positions, the downward pressure on price lessens. 4. Low prices not only make it harder for long-term holders to release their Bitcoin but also increase their desire to accumulate more. 5. Historical data shows that long-term Bitcoin investors have been steadily increasing, with more holders viewing $BTC as a "rare asset" rather than a "commodity." Of course, this does not mean Bitcoin's price won't decline, but it represents that more holders have higher and more tolerant price expectations. Combined with other data, it shows that more $BTC is flowing into the hands of financially strong individuals who are unlikely to sell their assets easily. Especially for high-net-worth investors, Bitcoin allocation is relatively low and not a priority for liquidation. #Bitget Arriving means VIP! Crypto, US stocks, CFDs, global opportunities all in one place
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
I have to say, in the past six months, USD1's financial products have indeed been low-risk and high-yield, which is also a smart move in USD1's promotion. I remember seeing data a few days ago that USD1's margin ratio in Binance contracts has already become the highest. Such a strong airdrop is indeed rare.
BITWU
BITWU
⚡️Good News: Binance's $USD1 financial management event has been extended again! Speaking of which, this event has been ongoing for nearly half a year, with a total of five phases: 🔹Phase 1 (01-23 → 02-20): $40M equivalent in WLFI, APR 15.56% 🔹Phase 2 (02-20 → 03-20): 235M WLFI, APR 13.81% 🔹Phase 3 (03-20 → 04-17): 135M WLFI, APR 8.08% 🔹Phase 4 (04-17 → 05-15): $15M equivalent in WLFI, APR 5.79% 🔹Phase 5 (05-15 → 06-12): $13M equivalent in WLFI, APR estimated still around 4%~6% If you have held since the first phase, the average annualized return can reach nearly 10%. This is still much more comfortable than web2 financial products.
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
Bitcoin can't break through $82,000 and will drop to $40,000?? Recently, many friends have privately messaged me asking if $BTC will fall all the way down to $40,000 after failing to break through $82,000. First of all, from my personal understanding, the recent rise from $60,000 to $80,000 was mainly due to the easing of geopolitical tensions between the US and Iran. Some might ask, wasn’t the strong buying power around $60,000 the reason, because investors saw it as a great bottom-fishing point? This explanation isn’t quite accurate. From the price trend, it’s clear that when Bitcoin first dropped to around $60,000 in early February, investors were selling, and more BTC was rushing into exchanges, indicating that some holders were pessimistic due to the US-Iran conflict. Only about a month later, in early March, when news started circulating that the US and Iran might reconcile, funds gradually began to buy in. That’s why I said before that Bitcoin at $60,000 and at $80,000 are essentially the same; the rise wasn’t due to BTC itself. So, will it now drop to $40,000? Looking at current position data, investors still maintain decent buying power around $80,000. It does seem somewhat less than at the peak, but more BTC is still leaving exchanges, and there’s no large accumulation yet. In other words, at least for now, I see investors still buying rather than selling heavily. I’ve also said many times that Bitcoin’s price movements are more related to US macroeconomic, political, and economic factors, which affect the US, especially tech stocks, and thus impact $BTC. If Bitcoin falls to $40,000, it would either be because the US stock market has experienced a significant pullback or because Bitcoin itself faces a crisis. The former is possible—for example, if the US-Iran war reignites, or Iran uses nuclear weapons, or the US enters a recession, all of which could cause major drops in US stocks and Bitcoin. The latter is much less likely. But at least I think this has no direct relation to whether Bitcoin can break through $82,000. Overall, I personally don’t believe in the idea that if it doesn’t reach price X, it will definitely go to price Y. Significant price fluctuations will come from changes in US or global macroeconomic, political, or economic conditions. #Bitget VIP is here! Crypto, US stocks, CFDs, global opportunities all in one place
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
After 310 days, long-term holders' Bitcoin holdings have reached a new all-time high The last all-time high was on July 7, 2025, when Bitcoin's price was around $108,000. After that, the holdings of long-term holders began to decline, reaching a low of 14,441,390 BTC, which coincided with Bitcoin's price dropping to around $60,000. Since then, long-term Bitcoin holdings have continued to rise, seemingly without a direct correlation to price. When BTC price rises, this data rises; when BTC price falls, this data also rises. Currently, long-term held BTC has reached 14,847,218. This indicates: 1. Some long-term investors believe $60,000 was an excellent bottom-buying opportunity, and even at $80,000 they continued buying. 2. Even investors holding BTC at prices above $100,000 have selling targets well above $120,000, and more investors have long-term expectations for $BTC's value. 3. As long-term Bitcoin holdings increase, the circulating BTC in the market decreases. Short-term holders are currently the main drivers of price changes; when short-term holders reduce their positions, the downward pressure on price lessens. 4. Low prices not only make it harder for long-term holders to release their Bitcoin but also increase their desire to accumulate more. 5. Historical data shows that long-term Bitcoin investors have been steadily increasing, with more holders viewing $BTC as a "rare asset" rather than a "commodity." Of course, this does not mean Bitcoin's price won't decline, but it represents that more holders have higher and more tolerant price expectations. Combined with other data, it shows that more $BTC is flowing into the hands of financially strong individuals who are unlikely to sell their assets easily. Especially for high-net-worth investors, Bitcoin allocation is relatively low and not a priority for liquidation. #Bitget Arriving means VIP! Crypto, US stocks, CFDs, global opportunities all in one place
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
Vance stated that the US is making progress in negotiations with Iran US Vice President JD Vance said that after Trump rejected Tehran's latest proposal as unacceptable, he believes that negotiations with Iran are making progress. "I think we are making progress. The fundamental question is whether we have made enough progress to meet the president's red line?" Vance told reporters at the White House. "And that red line is very simple. He needs to be confident that we have taken several safeguards to ensure that Iran will never have nuclear weapons."
Phyrex.Ni
Phyrex.Ni
It's too hard